Travel Demand Model Results for Destination 2040 Needs Assessment
Table 1
  Demographic Assumptions for the Boston Region MPO’s
  2016 Baseline and 2040 No-Build Scenarios
| Variable | 2016 Baseline | 2040 No-Build | Percent Change from 2016 to 2040 | 
| Population | 3,178,600 | 3,524,500 | 10.9% | 
| Households | 1,282,100 | 1,490,600 | 16.3% | 
| Household Size | 2.4 | 2.3 | -4.4% | 
| Total Employment | 1,890,700 | 1,999,400 | 5.7% | 
| Basic | 357,100 | 302,700 | -15.2% | 
| Retail | 308,800 | 318,100 | 3.0% | 
| Service | 1,224,700 | 1,378,600 | 12.6% | 
| Households with Vehicles | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
| 0 Vehicles | 18% | 20% | 2% | 
| 1 Vehicle | 38% | 39% | 1% | 
| 2 Vehicles | 26% | 24% | -2% | 
| 3+ Vehicles | 18% | 16% | -2% | 
Table 2
  Daily Person-Trip Activity 
  2016 Baseline and 2040 No-Build Scenarios
| Variable | 2016 Baseline | 2040 No-Build | Percent Change from 2016 to 2040 | 
| Eastern Massachusetts | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
| Person Trips | 15,853,300 | 17,199,900 | 8.5% | 
| Auto | 13,276,400 | 14,198,500 | 6.9% | 
| Transit | 979,500 | 1,076,500 | 9.9% | 
| Non-Motorized | 1,597,500 | 1,924,900 | 20.5% | 
| Boston Region | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
| Person Trips | 10,991,400 | 12,012,000 | 9.3% | 
| Auto | 8,824,500 | 9,451,400 | 7.1% | 
| Transit | 821,100 | 908,800 | 10.7% | 
| Non-Motorized | 1,345,700 | 1,651,800 | 22.7% | 
Table 3
  Mode Choice
  2016 Baseline and 2040 No-Build Scenarios
| Variable | 2016 Baseline | 2040 No-Build | 
| Eastern Massachusetts | 
 | 
 | 
| Mode Share | 100% | 100% | 
| Auto Share | 84% | 83% | 
| Transit Share | 6% | 6% | 
| Non-Motorized Share | 10% | 11% | 
| Boston Region | 
 | 
 | 
| Mode Share | 100% | 100% | 
| Auto Share | 80% | 79% | 
| Transit Share | 7% | 8% | 
| Non-Motorized Share | 12% | 14% | 
Table 4
  Daily Transit-Trip Activity
  2016 Baseline and 2040 No-Build Scenarios
| Variable | 2016 Baseline | 2040 No-Build | Percent Change from 2016 to 2040 | 
| Eastern Massachusetts | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
| Transit Trips (linked) | 979,500 | 1,076,500 | 9.9% | 
| Transit Trips (unlinked) | 1,322,300 | 1,453,200 | 9.9% | 
| Bus | 351,600 | 363,100 | 3.3% | 
| Bus Rapid Transit | 32,400 | 46,500 | 43.5% | 
| SL1, SL2, SL4, SL5, 746 | 32,400 | 37,770 | 16.6% | 
| SL3 | 0 | 8,730 | -- | 
| Rapid Transit Lines | 811,400 | 893,500 | 10.1% | 
| Blue Line | 70,400 | 72,000 | 2.3% | 
| Orange Line | 210,000 | 231,100 | 10.0% | 
| Red Line | 290,000 | 318,100 | 9.7% | 
| Green Line | 241,000 | 272,300 | 13.0% | 
| Commuter Rail | 104,400 | 126,800 | 21.5% | 
| Ferry | 6,400 | 7,000 | 9.4% | 
| Express Bus | 16,100 | 16,400 | 1.9% | 
| Average Transfer Rate | 1.35 | 1.35 | 
 | 
Table 5
  Daily Highway-Trip Activity
  2016 Baseline and 2040 No-Build Scenarios
| Variable | 2016 Baseline | 2040 No-Build | Percent Change from 2016 to 2040 | 
| Eastern Massachusetts | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
| Vehicle Assignment | 11,775,400 | 12,627,300 | 7.2% | 
| Auto | 10,134,400 | 10,845,400 | 7.0% | 
| Trucks | 1,641,000 | 1,781,900 | 8.6% | 
| Vehicle-Miles Traveled | 120,970,700 | 128,310,300 | 6.1% | 
| Auto | 108,508,000 | 113,314,300 | 4.4% | 
| Trucks | 12,462,700 | 14,209,400 | 14.0% | 
| Vehicle-Hours of Travel | 4,289,100 | 4,666,100 | 8.8% | 
| Auto | 3,843,300 | 4,125,200 | 7.3% | 
| Trucks | 445,800 | 518,800 | 16.4% | 
| Average Speed | 28.2 | 27.5 | -2.5% | 
| Auto | 28.2 | 27.5 | -2.7% | 
| Trucks | 28.0 | 27.4 | -2.0% | 
| Average Auto Trip Length | 10.7 | 10.4 | -2.8% | 
| 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
| Boston Region | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
| Vehicle Assignment | 7,813,800 | 8,377,600 | 7.2% | 
| Auto | 6,616,800 | 7,077,600 | 7.0% | 
| Trucks | 1,196,900 | 1,300,000 | 8.6% | 
| Vehicle-Miles Traveled | 76,519,600 | 86,050,100 | 12.5% | 
| Auto | 68,457,800 | 71,085,500 | 3.8% | 
| Trucks | 8,061,900 | 8,730,600 | 8.3% | 
| Vehicle-Hours of Travel | 3,002,400 | 3,524,800 | 17.4% | 
| Auto | 2,683,100 | 2,847,600 | 6.1% | 
| Trucks | 319,300 | 347,900 | 9.0% | 
| Average Speed | 25.5 | 24.4 | -4.2% | 
| Auto | 25.5 | 25.0 | -2.2% | 
| Trucks | 25.2 | 25.1 | -0.6% | 
| Average Auto Trip Length | 10.3 | 10.0 | -3.0% | 
Figure 1
  Commuter Rail
  2040 No-Build Scenario:  Parking Demand over Existing Capacity

Figure 2
  Rapid Transit 
  2040 No-Build Scenario:  Parking Demand over Existing Capacity

Figure 3
  Priority Bus Study Corridors in the Boston Region

Figure 4
  Change in Bus Run Times on High Ridership Routes
  2016 Baseline and 2040 No-Build Scenarios
