FTA & FHWA Corrective Actions |
MPO Response & Proposed Action(s) |
Responsibility |
Due Date |
Status as of August 7, 2019 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Key Metropolitan Transportation Planning Documents and Processes |
blank |
blank |
blank |
blank |
|
blank |
blank |
blank |
blank |
In coordination with MassDOT and public transit operators, develop and publish a complete listing of obligated projects within 90 days after the close of the federal fiscal year. Include the approved amount programmed in the TIP, the total amount obligated, and the remaining balance for each project. This will ensure that the list of obligated projects fully meets all the required elements per 23 CFR 450.334. |
BRMPO staff have posted the FFY 2018 highway obligated projects list to the BRMPO web page, and have requested information on FFY 2018 obligated projects from the MWRTA, CATA, and the MBTA. BRMPO staff will work with MassDOT, the MBTA, and the regional transit authorities to post a complete listing of obligated projects within 90 days after the close of the federal fiscal year. |
MassDOT, MBTA, MWRTA, and CATA |
December 30, 2019, and ongoing |
MassDOT, MBTA, MWRTA, and CATA Action Required BRMPO staff have provided a detailed request for the required information to the MBTA and the RTAs. BRMPO staff have received the list of FFY 2018 obligated transit projects from the MBTA and is awaiting responses from MetroWest and CATA. Staff intend to post the list of FFY 2018 obligated transit projects in August 2019 and the list of all (highway and transit) FFY 2019 projects by December 30, 2019. |
|
blank |
blank |
blank |
blank |
Update MOU between the MPOs, MassDOT, the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), and providers of public transportation to include current requirements and the specific requirements of the South Coast Air Quality Management District vs. EPA ruling. |
The MassDOT-developed draft MOU update was presented and reviewed with staff from all MPOs in the Commonwealth, FHWA, FTA, EPA, and DEP at the annual air quality consultation meeting on March 6, 2019. At that meeting, MassDOT requested any additional comments or suggested edits within two weeks. DEP started a review by its general counsel and needed a longer comment period. MassDOT received a response from DEP on June 5, 2019. Since that time, MassDOT has worked with DEP to iron out remaining points of clarification. The revised draft is being distributed to the MPOs for their final review and signature. The expected timing of final MOU completion is early August 2019. |
MassDOT, MPOs, and DEP |
September 30, 2019 |
MassDOT, MPOs, and DEP Action Required In process; expected completion August 2019. |
FTA & FHWA Recommendations |
MPO Response & Proposed Action(s) |
Responsibility |
Target Date(s) |
Status as of August 7, 2019 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Key Metropolitan Transportation Planning Documents and Processes |
blank |
blank |
blank |
blank |
Metropolitan Transportation Plan |
blank |
blank |
blank |
blank |
|
The BRMPO MTP, Destination 2040, to be adopted in August 2019, includes a system performance report as required by federal legislation. It will include a description of performance measures and targets adopted by the BRMPO as of March 2019. Performance reports in future LRTPs will describe the BRMPO’s progress in meeting these initial targets. |
BRMPO |
October 1, 2019
October 1, 2023 |
In process |
|
The Destination 2040 MTP incorporates the goals, objectives, performance measures, and targets described in MassDOT’s TAMP, TAM, HSIP, and freight transportation planning documents. Performance reports in future LRTPs will describe the BRMPO’s progress in meeting these initial targets. |
BRMPO |
October 1, 2019
October 1, 2023 |
In process |
TIP |
blank |
blank |
blank |
blank |
Include specific descriptions of the anticipated effect of the TIP toward achieving the performance targets and linking investment priorities to those performance targets. |
The Performance Analysis chapter of the FFYs 2020―24 TIP details the BRMPO’s targets for federally required performance measures and describes how the projects in the TIP are expected to make progress towards these targets. BRMPO staff will continue to improve these descriptions in future TIP development cycles. |
BRMPO |
N/A |
Complete |
|
blank |
blank |
blank |
blank |
In cooperation with MassDOT and the other MPOs, explore updating the Massachusetts Association of Regional Planning Agencies (MARPA) formula to reflect current inputs (i.e., population and road mileage). |
BRMPO staff discussed this issue with MassDOT. |
MassDOT, BRMPO, and other Massachusetts MPOs |
October 2021 |
MARPA Action Required
|
|
blank |
blank |
blank |
blank |
Develop and implement a process for periodic assessment of implemented strategies to better inform decision-making on potential congestion management strategies in the future. This should include evaluating projects and strategies beyond those that have been constructed with BRMPO target funds. |
BRMPO staff will perform before and after studies to evaluate congestion and safety strategies at recently completed BRMPO TIP-funded and other locations.
|
BRMPO |
December 31, 2020 |
BRMPO included a before and after study in the FFY 2020 UPWP and plans to commence work in late 2019. |
|
blank |
blank |
blank |
blank |
Ensure all files associated with air quality conformity are readily available, should the public or another entity request to review (i.e., Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator (MOves) input files, Conformity SIP). |
MassDOT is responsible for determining conformity for Massachusetts; because of this, staff believe that MassDOT should be responsible for storing and archiving MOVES inputs and resulting emission factors. Staff recommend that MassDOT provide the MOVES inputs and resulting factors on its website, and BRMPO and other Massachusetts MPOs would provide a link from their websites to this MassDOT site. |
MassDOT and MPOs |
December 31, 2019 |
MassDOT Action Required BRMPO staff will coordinate with MassDOT to link the BRMPO’s website to the appropriate MassDOT files. |
Coordinated, Cooperative, and Comprehensive Planning Process |
blank |
blank |
blank |
blank |
MPO Organizational Structure |
blank |
blank |
blank |
blank |
|
BRMPO staff will work with BRMPO board members and/or a subcommittee to determine an approach to developing an operations plan.
Once the approach is determined, BRMPO staff will support the development of an operations plan. |
BRMPO |
January 2020
January 2021 |
BRMPO Action Required |
|
BRMPO staff will work with the Metropolitan Area Planning Council (the Vice Chair of the BRMPO), MassDOT, and BRMPO members and/or a subcommittee to review the voting procedures. |
BRMPO |
January 2021 |
BRMPO Action Required |
|
BRMPO staff will work with BRMPO members to identify appropriate information and training opportunities related to best practices in the field of regional transportation planning and new technologies and trends that are influencing the field. BRMPO staff recently contributed to a case study report published by the Federal Highway Administration entitled “Integrating Shared Mobility into Multimodal Transportation Planning: Metropolitan Area Case Studies;” as part of this, BRMPO staff, in coordination with MAPC, are presenting on a webinar on July 30, 2019. BRMPO staff intend to notify BRMPO members of this learning opportunity. BRMPO staff will continue to look for learning/training opportunities for BRMPO members.
|
BRMPO |
Ongoing |
Webinar scheduled on July 30, 2019: “Integrating Shared Mobility into Multimodal Transportation Planning: Metropolitan Area Case Studies.” |
Public Outreach and Public Involvement |
blank |
blank |
blank |
blank |
|
BRMPO staff are working to develop a more robust approach to tracking outreach strategies by type, populations reached, and outcomes. Staff are researching best practices used by other MPOs and will be testing new approaches to and methods for evaluating the effectiveness of various outreach strategies this summer (2019). Staff will continually refine these efforts as we continue to learn from our peers, test new approaches, and research best practices. |
BRMPO |
Ongoing |
BRMPO staff are currently planning summer 2019 outreach and are actively working on an outreach-tracking database and improved outreach effectiveness analysis measures. |
|
BRMPO staff are working on drafting a social media policy. |
BRMPO |
December 2019 |
In process |
Transit Planning |
blank |
blank |
blank |
blank |
|
It is BRMPO staff practice to work with the BRMPO to revise its TIP project selection criteria after the adoption of new goals and objectives in the LRTP. The next LRTP is scheduled to be endorsed by the BRMPO in August 2019, and BRMPO staff’s work to revise TIP project selection criteria began in June 2019. Since the BRMPO may adopt a Transit Modernization Investment Program and a Dedicated Bus Lane Investment Program (subset of the existing Complete Streets Investment Program) in the new LRTP, BRMPO staff will focus on developing TIP project evaluation criteria that allow the BRMPO to analyze and prioritize future projects that fall into these investment categories. Chapter 2 of the FFYs 2020–24 TIP clarifies how the BRMPO considers MassDOT and MBTA projects proposed for the TIP. The BRMPO does not currently evaluate these projects in the same way that they do the group of TIP projects funded with regional target funds. Projects proposed by MassDOT and the MBTA are evaluated with criteria established by the PSAC. While the BRMPO currently uses project selection criteria that are different from MassDOT’s PSAC criteria, the BRMPO develops project criteria with consideration of the PSAC criteria. The impact of this coordination is that all funded projects in the region (regionally funded/prioritized and state funded/prioritized) are prioritized in a way that moves the region towards the common goals and objectives of the BRMPO and MassDOT. Chapter 2 of the TIP also describes how the CIP and TIP project selection processes are aligned. Chapter 4 of the FFYs 2020–24 TIP explains and analyzes how investments, both regionally prioritized and state prioritized, address the targets adopted for Performance-Based Planning and Programming. |
BRMPO |
March 2020 (for revised BRMPO TIP criteria)
N/A
Ongoing (for analysis of how TIP programming addresses adopted Performance-Based Planning and Programming targets) |
BRMPO staff have initiated work to revise the TIP project selection criteria.
Complete (for clarification of BRMPO evaluation of MassDOT and MBTA TIP projects and explanation of the alignment between CIP and TIP project selection processes).
|
|
BRMPO staff will work with MassDOT, the MBTA, and other stakeholders to develop a consolidated list of ferryboat funding in the TIP. |
BRMPO, MassDOT, and MBTA |
May 2020 and ongoing |
BRMPO, MassDOT, and MBTA Action Required BRMPO staff have reached out to MassDOT and the MBTA to obtain the list of ferryboat funding. |
|
BRMPO staff will work with MassDOT Rail and Transit and the MBTA to identify potential voluntary NTD reporters. |
MassDOT, MBTA, and CTPS |
July 2020 |
|
Title VI and Nondiscrimination Data Collection and Analysis |
blank |
blank |
blank |
blank |
|
BRMPO staff will continue to explore and implement additional ways to determine if the transportation needs of Title VI and EJ populations are being met. |
BRMPO |
Ongoing |
Ongoing |
|
In May 2019, the BRMPO completed phase one of developing a methodology to identify potential DI/DBs. In this first phase, staff identified the forecasting error for each metric used to determine DI/DBs. BRMPO staff will conduct a UPWP study in FFY 2020 to complete phase two, which will develop a threshold for each metric. |
BRMPO |
September 2020 |
Phase one of developing DI/DB thresholds is complete. Work on phase two will begin October 1, 2019. |
|
The BRMPO website includes the findings and recommendations of the DI/DB Policy Working Group and the resulting draft DI/DB Policy, and references plans to refine the draft policy in FFY 2020. |
BRMPO |
N/A |
Complete |
Title VI and Nondiscrimination Outreach, Access & Limited English Proficiency (LEP) |
blank |
blank |
blank |
blank |
Continue to implement innovative outreach techniques designed to engage traditionally underserved Title VI/EJ populations. The targeted outreach efforts can include participating in special events that may not have a transportation focused agenda but are held in LEP communities. |
BRMPO staff will identify and implement new ways to engage Title VI and EJ populations in BRMPO activities, especially people with limited English proficiency. BRMPO staff will continue to attend special events in communities around the region, using innovative engagement tools and evaluating outreach efforts. |
BRMPO |
Ongoing |
Staff are continuing to implement innovative methods to improve engagement with Title VI and EJ populations. |
Planning Focus Areas |
blank |
blank |
blank |
blank |
Environmental Mitigation |
blank |
blank |
blank |
blank |
Address resiliency of the transportation system in the MTP and TIP selection criteria; and seek other opportunities to emphasize the importance of resiliency in transportation planning and programming of projects. |
The BRMPO incorporated resiliency into its current MTP, Charting Progress to 2040, as part of its Needs Assessment under the System Preservation goal. It was also included in the evaluation of projects for the recommended MTP under that goal area, rating projects on the ability to improve emergency response and respond to extreme conditions. The new Destination 2040 MTP has strengthened resiliency in multiple areas of the MTP and Needs Assessment documents. The BRMPO broadened its System Preservation and Modernization goal to specifically include resiliency in its goal statement and continued to include it in the objectives. It expanded resiliency in the Needs Assessment and expanded its Complete Streets program to include resiliency investments as an eligible project type for TIP funding. With this new goal and the related objectives, the BRMPO will revisit its TIP project evaluation criteria beginning in the summer of 2019 to reflect the enhanced focus on resiliency and to account properly for projects that prioritize resiliency investments. |
BRMPO |
March 2020 for TIP selection criteria |
Complete for MTP. The BRMPO is revisiting its TIP project evaluation criteria. |
Performance-Based Planning and Programming |
blank |
blank |
blank |
blank |
|
BRMPO staff will review and update the Performance Dashboard and provide notes about whether specific content on the various pages relates to federally required performance measures. BRMPO staff will review planning documents during development cycles and make any necessary clarifications or text additions to ensure that performance measures, metrics, and related data and information are clearly and consistently defined. Where necessary, staff will provide explanations and define relationships between measures so they do not appear to be in conflict. |
BRMPO |
December 1, 2019
June 30, 2020 |
|
|
The most recent coordination agreement for the Boston UZA was fully executed in January 2019, and the Performance-Based Planning and Programming Agreement for MassDOT, Massachusetts MPOs, and transit agencies was executed in April 2019. These recent agreements accounted for roles and responsibilities for data and information sharing, target selection, and performance reporting. BRMPO staff may suggest updates for MassDOT and other signatories of these agreements to consider, as needed. BRMPO staff will also coordinate with MassDOT on any performance-related terms that should be incorporated into the updated Air Quality Agreement. |
BRMPO, MassDOT, and RTAs
|
September 30, 2019 |
|
Freight Planning |
blank |
blank |
blank |
blank |
Consider adopting a routine cycle to updating the Freight Action Plan. |
BRMPO staff propose to prepare regular Freight Action Plan updates quadrennially to ensure that the Action Plan reflects the current needs of the BRMPO. |
BRMPO |
Ongoing |
An update has been completed and is scheduled to be presented to the BRMPO in July 2019. |
Connected and Autonomous Vehicles and Transportation Network Company |
blank |
blank |
blank |
blank |
|
BRMPO staff will continue to engage with stakeholders, academia, and other government entities to understand how TNCs and CAV technology will affect transportation planning in the region. Staff will work with MassDOT and the DPU to request information from TNCs and rideshare providers. Staff will explore new data sets and tools as a means to facilitate scenario planning and research opportunities concerning this topic in the Boston region. |
BRMPO |
Ongoing |
BRMPO staff monitor developments in technology, data sets, research, and tools to understand how TNCs and CAVs should be incorporated into the BRMPO’s long-term planning activities. Staff are currently exploring the BRMPO participation in a pilot study for a NCHRP 20-102(09) research project about TNC modeling tools. |
|
BRMPO staff will conduct outreach to groups representing rideshare and CAV interests with the goal of getting them involved in RTAC. In addition, staff will solicit RTAC member interest in presentations concerning state of the practice and the BRMPO’s efforts to incorporate rideshare services in long-term planning. |
BRMPO |
January 2020 and ongoing |
BRMPO staff are conducting membership outreach, which will include groups representing rideshare and CAV interests, this summer. |
3C = Coordinated, Cooperative, and Comprehensive Planning Process. BRMPO = Boston Region Massachusetts Planning Organization. CATA = Cape Ann Transportation Authority. CAV = Connected and Autonomous Vehicles. CIP = Capital Investment Plan. DEP = Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. DI/DB = disparate impacts and disproportionate burdens. DPU = Department of Public Utilities. EJ = Environmental Justice. EPA = US Environmental Protection Agency. FBP = Construction of Ferry Boats and Ferry Terminal Facilities Formula Program. FFY = Federal Fiscal Year. FHWA = Federal Highway Administration. FTA = Federal Transit Authority. HSIP = highway safety improvement program. LRTP = Long-Range Transportation Plan. MARPA = Massachusetts Association of Regional Planning Agencies. MassDOT = Massachusetts Department of Transportation. MBTA = Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. MOU = Memorandum of Understanding. MPO = Metropolitan Planning Organization. MTP = Metropolitan Transportation Plan. MWRTA = MetroWest Regional Transit Authority. NCHRP = National Cooperative Highway Research Program. NTD = National Transit Database. PSAC = Project Selection Advisory Council. RTA = regional transit authority. RTAC = Regional Transportation Advisory Council. TAMP = transportation asset management plan. TAM = transit asset management. TIP = Transportation Improvement Program. TMA = Transportation Management Association. TNC = transportation network company. UPWP = Unified Planning Work Program. UZA = Urbanized Area.