Draft Memorandum for the Record
Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization
Unified Planning Work Program Committee Meeting Minutes
April 17, 2025 Meeting
2:00 PM–3:15 PM, Zoom Video Conferencing Platform
Chris Klem, Chair, representing Monica Tibbits-Nutt, Secretary of Transportation and Chief Executive Officer of the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT)
The Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization’s (MPO) Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) Committee agreed to the following:
Materials for this meeting included the following:
1. FFY 2026 UPWP Discrete Study Scenarios (PDF) (HTML)
2. Draft FFY 2026 UPWP Discrete Study Ideas for Discussion (updated) (PDF) (HTML)
See attendance beginning on page 5.
There were none.
O. Saccocia presented the four discrete study scenarios that MPO staff developed ([PDF] [HTML]). For descriptions of each study, please see the Draft FFY 2026 UPWP Discrete Study Ideas for Discussion (PDF) (HTML).
She also explained several changes that were made to two study descriptions based on the feedback that the UPWP committee provided at the April 3 meeting.
S. O Saccocia said that staff clarified that study M-4, Multimodal Bottleneck Detection for the Region, will proactively identify and address safety risks for vulnerable road users and provide recommendations for safety improvements in multimodal bottleneck areas. This study will also produce insights that will contribute to Transportation Improvement Program project scoring.
S. O Saccocia also said that staff clarified that the outcome of study E-1, Representing the Experience of Limited Mobility Individuals, will be a technical memo, which will identify data gaps and potential analysis strategies that will enable MPO staff to better analyze the quality of destination access for individuals with limited mobility within various aspects of the agency’s planning work.
Len Diggins (Regional Transportation Advisory Council) expressed support for Scenario 3. He stated that the MPO would gain important insights about mobility options for the region’s elderly population from study E-1. He also explained that he was interested in study M-4 because it takes a proactive approach to addressing safety for vulnerable road users.
Julia Wallerce (Metropolitan Area Planning Council) asked how the scope for study L-1 would be scaled down from $70,000 to $50,000. Rebecca Morgan (MPO Staff) responded that the study could be priced at $50,000 if MPO and Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC) staff collaborated on this study together. She also explained that the data exploration part of this study could be started this year so that the study could be completed in FFY 2026 within the $50,000 budget.
David Koses (Town of Newton) and Jen Rowe (City of Boston) both expressed support for Scenario 3. D. Koses explained that he favors study E-1 because it is something that the MPO has not explored before. J. Rowe stated that they liked how the results of study M-4 would clearly benefit other MPO work.
Steve Olanoff (Three Rivers Interlocal Council) expressed support for study A-1. He stated that this study would yield useful results, especially for small communities in the region. He explained that it’s important for communities to have a coordinated approach to pedestrian-scale lighting.
D. Koses also expressed support for study A-1. He suggested that the committee could consider a different scenario that includes A-1, E-1, and P-9, all priced at $50,000.
C. Klem asked if staff could clarify how study P-9 would build off the FFY 2025 discrete study on roadway pricing. Annette Demchur (MPO Staff) explained that the proposed P-9 study would specifically focus on effective strategies for communicating about roadway pricing. C. Klem expressed support for this study since roadway pricing is currently a relevant topic in transportation.
S. Olanoff stated that he disliked study M-4 because he did not think it would be useful to municipalities in the region. He explained that the study would simply identify multimodal bottleneck areas. S. Olanoff expressed support for the new scenario, A-1, E-1, and P-9.
J. Rowe asked if staff could clarify how the results of study A-1 would connect to other MPO work. They stated that this study would be stronger if municipalities were encouraged to use the results of the guidebook to build pedestrian-scale lighting infrastructure through the MPO’s Community Connections program, for example. A. Demchur explained that the MPO could consider incorporating the findings of A-1 in the Complete Streets Program evaluation criteria, however, staff do not plan to revise these criteria until the next Long-Range Transportation Plan is developed. R. Morgan explained that, in addition to providing a guidebook for Boston-region communities, the findings of A-1 would be used by MPO staff when conducting technical assistance projects.
Tom Bent (Inner Core Committee) stated that he had conflicting opinions about A-1. He explained that this study may be duplicative, as there are preexisting resources about lighting guidance from MassDOT and the City of Boston. However, he liked how the study would focus on sidewalk lighting in addition to roadway lighting.
T. Bent expressed concern about study P-9. He stated that it may not be worth funding if the federal government does not approve a roadway pricing proposal for Boston. A. Demchur explained that a roadway pricing proposal wouldn’t likely be approved in the near future, and the purpose of the study is to prepare now for an eventual roadway pricing proposal.
L. Diggins asked why study A-1 was limited to small and medium-sized communities. Seth Asante (MPO Staff) explained that the proposal was originally developed to focus on smaller communities since large municipalities in the region typically have lighting guidelines already. S. Asante stated that large communities may also benefit from this study and staff will look to revise the scope of this proposal. T. Bent also stated that several municipalities have started to attach electric vehicle charging stations to municipal-owned lighting poles, and he suggested that staff consider this when developing the guidebook.
T. Bent suggested that staff revisit study M-2 next year. J. Wallerce explained that MAPC staff have also been working to acquire Transportation Network Company (TNC) data, and C. Klem agreed that after the data becomes available, the MPO could potentially refine the scope of the study and consider it next year.
A motion to include A-1: Pedestrian-Scale Lighting Guide for Small- and Medium-Sized Communities, E-1: Representing the Experience of Limited Mobility Individuals, and P-9: Roadway Pricing: Stakeholder Analysis, each at $50,000, in the FFY 2026 UPWP was made by the Three Rivers Interlocal Council (S. Olanoff). The motion was seconded by the Inner Core Committee (T. Bent). The motion carried.
L. Diggins requested that MPO members have a meeting with the agency’s general council, and Tegin Teich (Executive Director) stated that first, MPO staff will need to determine how that meeting may be structured. T. Teich stated that she will follow up about this after the committee meeting.
J. Wallerce stated that MAPC is hosting a webinar on the e-cargo bike resource webpage that MAPC recently released and invited committee members to join and share the invite.
The UPWP Committee will meet next on May 29, 2025, to review the draft FFY 2026 UPWP.
A motion to adjourn was made by the MBTA Advisory Council (Hanna Switlekowski) and seconded by the Regional Transportation Advisory Council (L. Diggins). The motion carried.
Members |
Representatives
and
Alternates |
Massachusetts Department of Transportation (Office of Transportation
Planning) |
Chris Klem |
MBTA Advisory Council |
Hanna Switlekowski |
Metropolitan Area Planning Council |
Julia Wallerce |
Regional Transportation Advisory Council |
Lenard Diggins |
At-Large City (City of Newton) |
David Koses |
City of Boston (Boston Transportation
Department) |
Jennifer Rowe |
Inner Core Committee (City of Somerville) |
Tom Bent |
Three Rivers Interlocal Council alternate
(Town of Westwood) |
Steven Olanoff |
SouthWest Advisory Planning Committee (Town of Wrentham) |
Rachel Benson |
Other
Attendees |
Affiliation |
Alison Felix |
Metropolitan Area Planning Council |
Janet Hobbs |
|
Ben Muller |
MassDOT |
Thomas O'Rourke |
Three Rivers Interlocal Council (Town of Norwood) |
Melissa Santley |
MassDOT |
Jon Seward |
|
MPO
Staff/Central Transportation Planning Staff |
Tegin Teich, Executive Director |
Seth Asante |
Priyanka Chapekar |
Abby Cutrumbes Heerema |
Annette Demchur |
Emily Domanico |
Jenn Emiko Kaplan |
Hiral Gandhi |
Shravanthi Gopalan Narayanan |
Dave Hong |
Elena Ion |
Adriana Jacobsen |
Ethan Lapointe |
Lauren Magee |
Erin Maguire |
Rose McCarron |
Rebecca Morgan |
Dorcas Okaidjah |
Gina Perille |
Olivia Saccocia |
Sam Taylor |
CIVIL RIGHTS NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC Welcome. Bem Vinda. Bienvenido. Akeyi. 欢迎. 歡迎. For additional information or to file a civil rights
complaint, visit www.bostonmpo.org/mpo_non_discrimination. To request accommodations at meetings (such as
assistive listening devices, materials in accessible formats and languages
other than English, and interpreters in American Sign Language and other
languages) or if you need this information in another language, please
contact: Boston Region
MPO Title VI Specialist 10 Park Plaza, Suite 2150 Boston, MA 02116 Phone:
857.702.3700 Email: civilrights@ctps.org For people with hearing or speaking difficulties,
connect through the state MassRelay service, www.mass.gov/massrelay. Please allow at least five business days for your
request to be fulfilled. |