MPO Meeting Minutes

Draft Memorandum for the Record

Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization Meeting

May 15, 2025, Meeting

10:00 AM–11:00 AM, Zoom Video Conferencing Platform

David Mohler, Chair, representing Monica Tibbits-Nutt, Secretary of Transportation and Chief Executive Officer of the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT)

Decisions

The Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) agreed to the following:

Meeting Agenda

1.    Introductions

See attendance on page 10.

2.    Chair’s Report—David Mohler, MassDOT

D. Mohler stated that the federal administration recently decided to require cooperation with the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) as a prerequisite for signing contracts for discretionary grants. D. Mohler stated that the Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC) received a draft contract extension for the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) on behalf of the MPO.

Eric Bourassa, MAPC, stated that there may be litigation between the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the USDOT over some of the terms and conditions in the draft contract, and MAPC will not be executing any contracts on behalf of the MPO until these issues are resolved.

Lenard Diggins, Regional Transportation Advisory Council, expressed support for MAPC’s position.

Brad Rawson, Inner Core Committee (City of Somerville), expressed appreciation for coordination and work between MAPC, the MPO, and MassDOT, and stated that many municipalities, including the City of Somerville, are struggling with the same issues. B. Rawson asked if there is space for information sharing on these issues, such as an executive session, and emphasized the importance of information sharing and coordination between state agencies, regional agencies, and municipalities.

Jen Rowe, City of Boston, stated that the City of Boston received similar information regarding its SS4A grant and the City of Boston would appreciate a forum, such as an executive session, for coordination as well.

D. Mohler stated that there would need to be research into the MPO’s ability to go into an executive session.

In addition, D. Mohler announced that an item on the meeting agenda, the Vision Zero Update, will be delayed to a future meeting due to outside issues.

3.    Executive Director’s Report—Tegin Teich, Executive Director, Central Transportation Planning Staff

T. Teich provided additional information on the MPO’s SS4A grant and stated that since the contract to extend the deadline for the grant-funded work past June 2025 will not be signed, the MPO will be taking an accelerated approach to deliver a Vision Zero Action Plan within the next month and a half that meets the requirements of the grant and the needs of the region. T. Teich stated that there will be several Vision Zero updates at the upcoming MPO board meetings.

T. Teich stated that she attended a joint event hosted by the Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations (AMPO) and the National Association of Regional Councils (NARC), which was an excellent opportunity to coordinate with other leaders about the challenges and opportunities for MPOs and regions and the important role that MPOs play in working to ensure that federal investments are effective at the regional and local levels. T. Teich discussed some of the main themes from the event, including data-driven processes, challenges across municipal boundaries, and the need for specific regional goals and measures to ensure that investments have value in the context of MPOs’ goals.

T. Teich stated that there was a request at the previous board meeting to provide a recap of the Transit Working Group (TWG) meeting on April 24, 2025. T. Teich stated that the meeting consisted of a presentation from Patricia Cahill, MassDOT, whose team has been working on a statewide transit services map. T. Teich stated that this has been a highly requested project for regional stakeholders because, in the future, this map could be used to help identify transit service gaps and potential connections. The presentation was followed by a discussion about potential applications for the data.

T. Teich stated that MPO staff have received 20 complete applications for Community Advisory Council membership from a variety of stakeholders, and MPO staff are in touch with other stakeholders that have expressed interest in applying. T. Teich encouraged board members to share the application with their communities.

T. Teich provided staffing updates, and stated that Lauren Magee, MPO staff, will be promoted to Transportation/Environmental Planner in the MPO Planning and Policy team, effective on May 19, 2025. In addition, T. Teich stated that Hannah Jun will be joining the MPO through a Harvard Graduate School of Design Community Service Fellowship Award and will join the MPO Planning and Policy team from June to August 2025.

T. Teich reviewed the meeting agenda, which included two action items and one presentation.

4.    Public Comments  

There were none.

5.    Committee Chairs’ Reports

J. Rowe stated that the TIP Process, Engagement, and Readiness Committee will meet following this meeting at 1:00 PM. Committee members will discuss anticipated changes between the draft FFYs 2026–30 TIP document that is out for public review and the final document that the full board will vote to endorse, debrief about the FFYs 2026–30 TIP development process, and discuss research from MPO staff about trends in project readiness and MassDOT’s process, which will inform expectations for TIP project proponents that the committee will bring to the MPO board.

Chris Klem, MassDOT, stated that the Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) Committee will meet on May 29, 2025. C. Klem stated that the meeting will include a recommendation from the committee to the full MPO board to release the FFY 2026 UPWP document for a 21-day public comment period.


 

6.    Action Item: Approval of April 3, 2025, MPO Meeting Minutes

Documents posted to the MPO meeting calendar

1.     April 3, 2025, MPO Meeting Minutes (pdf) (html)

Vote

A motion to approve the minutes of the meeting of April 3, 2025, was made by MAPC (E. Bourassa) and seconded by the Inner Core Committee (City of Somerville) (Tom Bent). The motion carried.

7.    Action Item: FFYs 2025–29 TIP Amendment Eleven—Ethan Lapointe, MPO Staff

Documents posted to the MPO meeting calendar

1.     FFYs 2025–29 TIP Amendment Eleven (pdf) (html)

Ethan Lapointe, MPO staff, presented FFYs 2025–29 TIP Amendment Eleven, which included the following changes to the Transit Program:

·       Programming of four new Community Transit Grants

·       Removal of one MetroWest Regional Transit Authority (MWRTA) project

·       Changes across the MBTA capital program to reflect the MBTA Capital Investment Plan update

E. Lapointe stated that the removed MWRTA project was a prospective application to the Strengthening Mobility and Revolutionizing Transportation (SMART) Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Grant program that was not awarded, and the removal of the project reflects that the discretionary grant was not awarded.

In addition, E. Lapointe stated that there were changes within the Transit Program and parallel changes made within the Statewide Highway programs for the flexing of FHWA Carbon Reduction Program funds between MassDOT and the MBTA for bus electrification efforts, the Quincy bus facility modernization, and the procurement of 40-foot battery electric buses.

E. Lapointe stated that there was a proposed change to Amendment Eleven to remove Project 607342, Milton–Intersection Improvements at Route 28 and Chickatawbut Road, from the amendment and keep the project programmed in FFY 2025 of the TIP.

E. Lapointe stated that MPO staff did not receive any public comments on Amendment Eleven during the public comment period.

Discussion

John Bechard, MassDOT Highway Division, stated that several briefings are planned about Project 607342, Milton–Intersection Improvements at Route 28 and Chickatawbut Road, and MassDOT is working through the permitting for the project. J. Bechard stated that the project is still on track for FFY 2025, and the project was mistakenly added to Amendment Eleven by MassDOT.

Vote

A motion to endorse FFYs 2025–29 TIP Amendment Eleven with the removal of changes to Project 607342, Milton–Intersection Improvements at Route 28 and Chickatawbut Road from the amendment, was made by MAPC (E. Bourassa) and seconded by the Advisory Council (L. Diggins). The motion carried.

8.     Action Item: FFYs 2025–29 TIP Adjustment Three—Ethan Lapointe, MPO Staff

Documents posted to the MPO meeting calendar

1.     FFYs 2025–29 TIP Adjustment Three (pdf) (html)

E. Lapointe presented FFYs 2025–29 TIP Adjustment Three, which included changes to the FFY 2025 Transit Program to reflect reallocations of state funding by the Cape Ann Transportation Authority (CATA) and MassDOT Community Transit Grant awards.

E. Lapointe stated that Community Transit Grant awards have previously been programmed through TIP amendments. These changes only require an adjustment, however, because the funding of the awards is provided through the Mobility Assistance Program, which is already included within the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP).

E. Lapointe described the changes included in Adjustment Three, which is summarized in Tables 1 and 2.


 

Table 1
FFYs 2025–29 TIP Adjustment Three: FFY 2025 Transit Program

Project ID and Name

Change Type

Funding Source

FFY 2025–29 Budget

FFY 2026–30 Budget

Difference

T00073: CATA–Rehab/Renovation Administration and Operations Facility

Cost Decrease

RTACAP

$551,100

$501,100

-$50,000

CATA011817: CATA–Paratransit Software Upgrades

Scope Change, Cost Increase

FTA Section 5307, RTACAP

$65,000

$295,000

+$230,000

CATA = Cape Ann Transportation Authority. FFY = Federal Fiscal Year. FTA = Federal Transit Administration. RTACAP = Regional Transit Authority Capital Funds. TIP = Transportation Improvement Program.

 

Table 2
FFYs 2025–29 TIP Adjustment Three:
New FFY 2025 Community Transit Grant Projects

Project ID and Name

Funding Source

New Budget

CATA012079: Wenham Council on Aging–Purchase of 1 Type A Vehicle

FTA Section 5310, Local Funds

$83,684

MBTA012092: City of Lynn - Purchase of One Type A Vehicle

FTA Section 5310, GOBOND

$83,684

MBTA012093: SCM Community Transportation Purchase of One Type E Vehicle

FTA Section 5310, ONF

$112,852

MBTA012095: City of Quincy Council on Aging–Purchase of Four Low Floor Vehicles

FTA Section 5310, ONF

$794,800

MBTA012096: Melrose Council on Aging–Purchase of One Low Floor Vehicle

FTA Section 5310, ONF

$198,720

MBTA012097: Town of Burlington Council on Aging–Purchase of One Type E2B Vehicle

FTA Section 5310, Local Funds

$118,174

MWRTA012105: MWRTA–Purchase of 2 Type E Vehicles

FTA Section 5310, GOBOND

$225,702

MWRTA012106: MWRTA–Purchase of 3 Type E2A Vehicles

FTA Section 5310, GOBOND

$372,727

CATA = Cape Ann Transportation Authority. FFY = Federal Fiscal Year. FTA = Federal Transit Administration. GOBOND = General Obligation Bond. MBTA = Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. MWRTA = MetroWest Regional Transit Authority. ONF = Other Non-Federal, which can include funding from nonprofit organization budgets or fundraising. TIP = Transportation Improvement Program.

 

Discussion

L. Diggins expressed support for Project CATA011817, CATA–Paratransit Software Upgrades, which will support a microtransit pilot system.

Vote

A motion to endorse FFYs 2025–29 TIP Adjustment Three was made by the Advisory Council (L. Diggins) and seconded by the MWRTA (Tyler Terrasi). The motion carried.

9.    Public Review Policies—Annette Demchur, Director of Policy and Planning

Documents posted to the MPO meeting calendar

1.     Public Review Period Policy for MPO Certification Documents Technical Memorandum (pdf) (html)

A. Demchur presented information on the MPO’s Public Review Period Policy for certification documents, specifically the Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), the TIP, the UPWP, and the Public Engagement Plan.

A. Demchur stated that the MPO’s policies and requirements for public review periods for certification documents are documented in the Public Engagement Plan and are essential for maintaining the transparency, public accessibility, and accountability of the public transportation, planning, and decision-making process. Specifically, the public review period policies provide members of the public with adequate time to share their perspectives on issues that might otherwise have limited public participation opportunities.

A. Demchur stated that the MPO’s policies are informed by the federal public participation requirements which can be found in Title 23, Section 450 of the Code of Federal Regulations, specifically, Section 450.3.1.6, which states that MPOs need to develop a process for providing all interested parties with reasonable opportunities to be involved in metropolitan transportation planning processes. Federal regulations also state that MPOs must include policies to provide adequate time for public review and comment at key decision points, including a reasonable opportunity to comment on the proposed items.

A. Demchur stated that the MPO’s Public Engagement Plan requires multi-week public review periods for certification documents prior to their endorsement. The minimum public review periods prior to endorsement of the certification documents are as follows:

·       TIP: Minimum of 21 days

·       UPWP: Minimum of 21 days

·       LRTP: Minimum of 30 days

·       Public Engagement Plan: Minimum of 45 days

In addition, A. Demchur reviewed the  minimum public review periods for endorsing amendments to certification documents:

·       TIP Amendments: Minimum of 21 days

·       UPWP Amendments: Not required

·       LRTP Amendments: Minimum of 30 days

·       Public Engagement Plan Amendments: Minimum of 45 days

A. Demchur stated that federal requirements allow for a reduction in the length of public review periods or waiving public review periods for amendments to the TIP and LRTP under extreme or emergency circumstances. A. Demchur stated that extreme circumstances are defined as an unforeseen regulatory requirement, and emergency circumstances are defined as a need to take immediate action to protect public safety or take advantage of an extraordinary funding opportunity. A. Demchur stated that the Public Engagement Plan includes provisions to reduce the public review periods for TIP amendments and LRTP amendments to 15 days for extreme circumstances and to waive the public review period in emergency circumstances. A. Demchur stated that federal requirements do not allow for reductions to the public review period for amendments to the Public Engagement Plan.

A. Demchur presented a timeline for public review periods and MPO meetings, which demonstrated that certification documents or amendments to certification documents cannot be released for a full public review period and then endorsed at the next meeting. A. Demchur highlighted that MPO staff post meeting materials one week prior to the meeting date, which does not allow MPO staff enough time to incorporate feedback from the public review period into the document prior to posting.

Discussion

J. Rowe expressed appreciation for the clarification on the MPO’s public review options and requirements, and stated that the technical memorandum will serve as a good future reference.

10. Members’ Items

E. Bourassa confirmed that the MPO board can go into an executive session when there is an issue related to litigation and stated that he would coordinate with MPO staff and others.

11. Adjourn

A motion to adjourn was made by MAPC (E. Bourassa) and seconded by the Inner Core Committee (City of Somerville) (T. Bent). The motion carried.


 

Attendance

Members

Representatives

and Alternates

At-Large City (City of Everett)

Jay Monty

At-Large City (City of Newton)

David Koses

At-Large Town (Town of Brookline)

Erin Chute

City of Boston

Jen Rowe

Matt Moran

Federal Highway Administration

Anthony Jones

Inner Core Committee (City of Somerville)

Tom Bent

Brad Rawson

Massachusetts Department of Transportation

David Mohler

John Romano

Derek Krevat

Chris Klem

MassDOT Highway Division

John Bechard

Lyris Liautaud

Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA)

Sandy Johnston

MBTA Advisory Board

Hanna Switlekowski

Isabella MacKinnon

Metropolitan Area Planning Council

Eric Bourassa

Julia Wallerce

MetroWest Regional Collaborative (City of Framingham)

Dennis Giombetti

Minuteman Advisory Group on Interlocal Coordination (Town of Acton)

Kristen Guichard

North Shore Task Force (City of Beverly)

Darlene Wynne

North Suburban Planning Council (Town of Burlington)

John Strauss

Regional Transportation Advisory Council

Lenard Diggins

Regional Transit Authorities (MetroWest Regional Transit Authority)

Jim Nee

Tyler Terrasi

South Shore Coalition (Town of Hull)

Chris DiIorio

South West Advisory Planning Committee (Town of Wrentham)

Rachel Benson

Three Rivers Interlocal Council (Town of Norwood)

Tom O’Rourke

Steve Olanoff

 

 

Other Attendees

Affiliation

Ben Cares

City of Chelsea

Meghan McNamara

City of Lexington

Denise A Valenti

Impairment Measurement Marijuana and Driving (IMMAD)

Andrew Wang

MassDOT

Arnav Chatterjee

MassDOT

Barbara Lachance

MassDOT

Benjamin Muller

MassDOT

Caleb Plummer

MassDOT

Cheryll-Ann Senior

MassDOT

Derek Shooster

MassDOT

Jonathan Church

MassDOT

Katherine Duffy

MassDOT

Melissa Santley

MassDOT

Michelle Scott

MassDOT

Miranda Briseño

MassDOT

Patricia Cahill

MassDOT

Peter Sutton

MassDOT

Sarah Bradbury

MassDOT

Tracie Lenhardt

MassDOT

Jeff Coletti

MWRTA

Rich Benevento

Tighe & Bonde

Aleida Leza

Town of Belmont Resident

JR Frey

Town of Hingham

Alex Martinez Sprague

 

 

MPO Staff/Central Transportation Planning Staff

Tegin Teich, Executive Director

Abby Cutrumbes Heerema

Adriana Jacobsen

Ali Kleyman

Annette Demchur

Bradley Putnam

Dave Hong

Elena Ion

Erin Maguire

Ethan Lapointe

Gina Perille

Lauren Magee

Olivia Saccocia

Priyanka Chapekar

Rebecca Morgan

Sam Taylor

Stella Jordan

 


 

CIVIL RIGHTS NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC

Welcome. Bem Vinda. Bienvenido. Akeyi. 欢迎. 歡迎.

 

You are invited to participate in our transportation planning process, free from discrimination. The Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is committed to nondiscrimination in all activities and complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin (including limited English proficiency). Related federal and state nondiscrimination laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of age, sex, disability, and additional protected characteristics.

 

For additional information or to file a civil rights complaint, visit www.bostonmpo.org/mpo_non_discrimination.

 

To request accommodations at meetings (such as assistive listening devices, materials in accessible formats and languages other than English, and interpreters in American Sign Language and other languages) or if you need this information in another language, please contact:

 

Boston Region MPO Title VI Specialist

10 Park Plaza, Suite 2150

Boston, MA 02116

Phone: 857.702.3700

Email: civilrights@ctps.org

 

For people with hearing or speaking difficulties, connect through the state MassRelay service, www.mass.gov/massrelay. Please allow at least five business days for your request to be fulfilled.